首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of building products attributes – a comparative study between eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled products available in the New Zealand market
【2h】

Assessment of building products attributes – a comparative study between eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled products available in the New Zealand market

机译:评估建筑产品属性–新西兰市场上生态标签产品和非生态标签产品的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Green consumers often report confusion about types of sustainable products available on the market; they question a product’s durability, reliability and its specific environmental credentials against their non-green counterparts. The construction industry is a very pertinent sector responsible for a high level of energy consumption, hazardous emissions, and waste generation. There is a high demand in New Zealand’s construction industry for studies that identify attributes of sustainable products. The overall objective of this study was to assess sustainable aspects of building products in New Zealand and compare eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled products. The main attributes analysed were performance, retail price, and environmental credentials, including: volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions, recycled content, hazardous substances, waste and energy management. In addition to comparing eco-labelled to non-eco-labelled products, historical information of eco-labelled products was obtained from the period before the eco-label certification in order to show the main changes that had occurred over time in specific sustainable products. (Note: date range varies between product to product. In the studied sample the range is from 1996 to 2012). The analysis was carried out according to eco-labels standards, the New Zealand Building Code, and New Zealand market trends. Building products studied were restricted to paints, carpets and thermal building insulations. These groups of products were chosen based on a number of criteria, including: different lifespan, importance for New Zealand’s consumers, number of manufacturers and retailers in New Zealand, and number of certified products.The comparative analysis regarding the specific environmental credentials showed that the majority of the organizations with eco-labelled products provide more comprehensive information (such as: chemical components and product performance) for consumers in comparison to non-eco-labelled product manufacturers. Concerning performance, eco-labelled carpets shows a greater improvement than non-eco-labelled ones. Nonetheless, thermal building insulations and paints performance were no different between eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled products. The retail price shows a different figure; non-eco-labelled paints have a lower retail price than eco-labelled ones, while carpets and thermal building insulation provide similar prices between the eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled products. Finally, the historical data analysis indicated that the majority of the organizations did not provide sufficient information about products’ specific environmental credentials in the period before product certification. Yet, information obtained from the few organizations that provided historical data demonstrate that the environmental benefits were indeed lower in the period before the environmental certification. Today, diverse “sustainable” products are available in the market; however, green consumers face barriers (amount and quality of information) concerning the sustainable aspects of these products. This study demonstrates that the extent of information that organizations provide to consumers depends on the level of requirement from external inputs; eco-label products need to comply with comprehensive and strict criteria, thus their manufacturers are obligated to test their products and make the information (findings) public. . Hence, credibility regarding these products’ environmental credentials is higher. A pressing demand for further research is whether building products manufactures are concerned and understand about their products’ environmental credentials. How these figures can, at the same time, help nature while saving resources and helping the competitiveness of manufacturers in the New Zealand market. Besides, another area of further research could be how much consumers perceive and care about these environmental credentials in building products.
机译:绿色消费者经常报告对市场上可获得的可持续产品类型感到困惑;他们对产品的耐用性,可靠性和特定的环境资质与非绿色产品进行了质疑。建筑行业是一个非常相关的行业,负责高水平的能源消耗,有害排放物和废物产生。新西兰的建筑行业对确定可持续产品属性的研究有很高的要求。这项研究的总体目标是评估新西兰建筑产品的可持续性,并比较生态标签和非生态标签的产品。分析的主要属性是性能,零售价格和环境资质,包括:挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放,可回收成分,有害物质,废物和能源管理。除了将生态标签产品与非生态标签产品进行比较之外,还从生态标签认证之前获取了生态标签产品的历史信息,以显示特定可持续产品在一段时间内发生的主要变化。 (注意:日期范围因产品而异。在所研究的样本中,范围为1996年至2012年)。分析是根据生态标签标准,《新西兰建筑规范》和新西兰市场趋势进行的。研究的建筑产品仅限于油漆,地毯和建筑保温材料。这些产品组的选择基于多种标准,包括:不同的使用寿命,对新西兰消费者的重要性,新西兰的制造商和零售商的数量以及认证产品的数量。对特定环境证书的比较分析表明,与非生态标签产品制造商相比,大多数具有生态标签产品的组织为消费者提供了更全面的信息(例如:化学成分和产品性能)。在性能方面,生态标签地毯比非生态标签地毯有更大的进步。尽管如此,生态标签产品和非生态标签产品的建筑隔热材料和涂料性能没有差异。零售价显示不同的数字。非生态标签涂料的零售价低于生态标签涂料的零售价,而地毯和隔热建筑材料在生态标签产品和非生态标签产品之间的价格相近。最后,历史数据分析表明,大多数组织在产品认证之前的这段时间内没有提供有关产品特定环境证书的足够信息。但是,从提供历史数据的少数组织获得的信息表明,在获得环境认证之前的时期内,环境收益确实较低。如今,市场上提供了多种“可持续”产品。但是,绿色消费者在这些产品的可持续性方面面临障碍(信息量和质量)。这项研究表明,组织提供给消费者的信息的程度取决于外部投入的需求水平。生态标签产品需要遵守全面而严格的标准,因此其制造商有义务测试其产品并公开信息(发现)。 。因此,有关这些产品的环境信誉的信誉更高。迫切需要进一步研究的是建筑产品制造商是否关心并了解其产品的环境资质。这些数字如何同时可以帮助自然界,同时节省资源并提高制造商在新西兰市场上的竞争力。此外,进一步研究的另一个领域可能是,消费者对建筑产品中的这些环境认证有多大的了解和关心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Esteves, M. C.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号